Job Interview Online Practice Test Question. Youll never get a Job if you dont have a Good Answer to this frequently asked job interview question Select the right answer to determine if you are prepared for a successful job interview. Test Your Job Interview Skills Thank you for taking the time to interview with us, but weve decided to hire someone else. No job seeker wants to hear these words after their interview. Note Answering this job interview question wrong could cost you your new jobPatent FAQs USPTOExample A An applicant based in Chicago, Illinois, directs US counsel to prepare, file and prosecute an application in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The US counsel subsequently sends the application to foreign counsel for filing and prosecution in foreign jurisdictions. The US counsel directs foreign counsel to provide copies of all communications from the foreign office by fax or overnight mail within seven days of receipt thereof, and expressly reserves all decision making authority as to prosecution of the US and foreign applications. On January 5, 2. 00. Germany receives a communication from the European Patent Office that includes a list of citations of patents. On January 8, the foreign counsel, pursuant to the standing instructions of US counsel, sends by overnight mail, a copy of the communication from the EPO. The document is received by US counsel on January 1. C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview Card' title='C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview Card' />On January 3. US counsel reviews the document and discovers a previously uncited patent. A copy of the patent and an IDS is then prepared and filed by the US counsel on February 1. Example B An applicant based in Paris, France, directs French counsel to prepare, file and prosecute an application in the European Patent Office. AJQFHtDQcE73cvWiZ2tdTrIEkgR1-8pT0afyc9e-FaLtNpCFW5I_z9eQtqPx1p-zRk4=h310' alt='C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview Question' title='C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview Question' />Youll never get a Job if you dont have a Good Answer to this frequently asked job interview question Select the right answer to determine if you are prepared for a. DATASTAGE Frequently asked Questions and Tutorials DATASTAGE Frequently asked Questions and Tutorials 1. DATASTAGE QUESTIONS 2. DATASTAGE FAQ from GEEK. C interview questions and answers for freshers. It is basic c language technical frequently asked interview questions and answers. It includes data structures. I work for a client of TCS. So, I have to post as an anonymous coward due to legal reasons. I am quite alarmed by Sambeets response, especially his 5th point. IAS Preparation tips for beginners and busting of some of the Myths and Lies surrounding IAS Exam Preparation. The EPO application is then sent to US counsel by French counsel to be reviewed, edited and prepared for filing in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The US counsel works with the French counsel to review the edited application, and then files the US application. The review and editing of the US application also leads the French counsel to amend its EPO application. On January 5, 2. 00. French counsel receives a search report from the European Patent Office that includes a list of six patents. C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview Rounds' title='C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview Rounds' />On January 2. US counsel receives from French counsel by overnight mail a copy of the communication from the EPO and suggests that the US counsel review the search report and take appropriate action. On January 2. French counsel provides a copy of the search report to the applicant. About Chandoo. org Excel and Charting Tips site blog. About the author Purna Duggirala Chandoo. On January 3. 0, 2. US counsel reviews the document and discovers a previously uncited patent. A copy of the patent and an IDS is then prepared and filed by the US counsel on February 1. Example C An applicant based in Chicago, Illinois, hires US counsel to prepare an application suitable for filing in the United States and the European Patent Office. The US counsel engages a German attorney to assist in the review and editing of the application to take account of issues relevant to EPO practice. The US counsel then reviews the edited application, approves the changes, and files it in the United States. The US counsel then directs the German attorney to file the application in the EPO. During prosecution of the US case, the US counsel receives an office action citing three patents. On December 1, 2. US counsel sends the three patents to the German attorney for review and appropriate action. On January 5, 2. 00. German attorney receives a search report from the EPO that cites the three previously cited patents, plus a fourth patent, designating all as X references. On January 1. 5, the German attorney reviews the fourth patent and compares it to the three patents cited in the US prosecution. The German attorney concludes that the fourth patent is duplicative of one of the three patents, and takes no further action. On March 1, 2. 00. US counsel is informed of the citation of the fourth patent by the EPO and the decision of the German attorney that the information in the newly cited patent was duplicative of the three patents previously cited by the USPTO. The US counsel also obtains copies of the newly cited patent on this date. C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview For Freshers' title='C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview For Freshers' />On March 5, 2. US counsel files an IDS containing the newly cited patent. Introduction. 37 CFR 1. CFR 1. 9. 7 and 1. CFR 1. 7. 04c6, c8, c9, or c1. CFR 1. 5. 6c more than thirty days prior to the filing of the information disclosure statement. The determination of when the thirty day period begins to run is dependent on the role of each entity involved in the prosecution of the US and foreign applications, and the role that each plays if any vis vis the US application. The inventors, the assignee and the US patent counsel are all individuals designated in 3. CFR 1. 5. 6c. The issue is whether the foreign patent counsel is also an individual designated in 3. CFR 1. 5. 6c. 3. CFR 1. The Isk Pro Guide. CFR 1. 5. 6 are Each inventor named in the application Each attorney or agent who prepares or prosecutes the application and. Every other person who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application and who is associated with the inventor, with the assignee or with anyone to whom there is an obligation to assign the application. Based on these elements of 3. CFR 1. 5. 6c, the following would be the conclusions of the Office in the three examples cited above. Answer to Example A The thirty day period would be calculated from January 1. As such, the IDS filed on February 1. CFR 1. 7. 04d, and thus would not result in a reduction of any patent term pursuant to 3. CFR 1. 7. 04c6, c8, c9, or c1. In this example, the foreign counsel has no substantive role in the prosecution of the US application. The explicitly defined role of the foreign counsel relative to the US counsel in combination with the practice in the described fact pattern removes any potential doubt as to the role of the foreign counsel. Answer to Example B The thirty day period would be calculated from January 5, 2. As such, the submission of the IDS would not be received within the thirty day window in 3. CFR 1. 7. 04d, and thus could result in a reduction of any patent term pursuant to 3. CFR 1. 7. 04c6, c8, c9, or c1. In this example, the USPTO would consider the French counsel to have been a party within the meaning of 3. CFR 1. 5. 6c. The French counsel, based on the above facts, played a material role in the preparation and prosecution of the US application e. US counsel to amend the application and subsequently amended the EPO application based on the work product produced with US counsel. C Programs Asked In Tcs Interview How To ApplyIn addition to the French counsel, the applicant would in any case be a party within the meaning of 3. CFR 1. 5. 6c. Answer to Example C The thirty day period would be calculated from January 5, 2. As such, the submission of the IDS would be determined to have not been received, received within the thirty day window in 3. CFR 1. 7. 04d, and thus could result in a reduction of any patent term pursuant to 3. CFR 1. 7. 04c6, c8, c9, or c1. In this example, the USPTO would consider the participation of the German counsel in the prosecution and decision making as to the relevance of the newly cited art vis vis the previously cited three patents to be a material participation in the US prosecution. Apps Technical 0 Apps Technical interview questions and 12 answers by expert members with experience in Apps Technical subject. Discuss each question in detail for. As such, the German counsel would be considered by the USPTO to be a party covered by 3. CFR 1. 5. 6c, and as such, would evaluate compliance with 3. CFR 1. 7. 04d from the date that the foreign counsel first learned of the fourth patent i.